Choosing the method
Moderated sessions for the why, unmoderated tests for larger samples, card sorting for menu structures and first-click tests to see whether people find the right starting point.
Which method fits depends on your question. We often combine several to grasp both behaviour and motives.
Moderated sessions for the why, unmoderated tests for larger samples, card sorting for menu structures and first-click tests to see whether people find the right starting point.
Participants who match your audience: regulars, newcomers, older people, specialists. We help with the call-out and the thank-you.
Realistic goals such as “Order six bottles of Blaufränkisch as a gift to another address”, with no hint about where to click.
In parallel we assess the interface against proven criteria: clarity, feedback, error prevention, consistency and effort per step.
Keyboard and screen reader use, contrast, labels and error messages against WCAG 2.1 AA and EN 301 549. Whether the Austrian Accessibility Act applies to your service is a question for your legal adviser.
Problems ranked by frequency and severity, video snippets as evidence and specific suggestions for copy, flows and design.
Once changes are live, a small second round checks that they work and have not created new obstacles.
A round including preparation, sessions and analysis usually takes two to three weeks. The sessions themselves fit into a few days.
Analytics, support queries and your own hunches are distilled into one clear question for the test.
Method, tasks, recruitment and a GDPR-compliant consent form.
Via Teams or Google Meet, roughly 45 minutes per person, recorded with consent.
A prioritised report, a video presentation and a short round after implementation.
Do not ask whether people like it; watch whether it works. In conversation people often call a page “clear” and then fail the very first task. Opinions are polite, behaviour is honest. That is why we set tasks rather than ask questions, and analyse what people do rather than what they say about it.
Because serious problems repeat quickly. Beyond the fifth person, little that is fundamentally new turns up. A second round after the fixes is a better use of budget than more people in the first.
An A/B test shows which of two variants performs better, not why. A usability test reveals the reasons. The ideal is to combine them: understand first, then compare variants deliberately.
Yes, and that is often cheapest. A clickable Figma prototype is enough to check structure and wording before any code is written.
Participants consent in writing and know why and for how long they are recorded. Videos are stored on EU servers with restricted access and deleted after the agreed period.
Which website or app should improve, and where do you suspect the trouble lies? We will propose a suitable method.
Your enquiry has arrived
Our reply reaches you within one working day. Outages that leave your staff unable to work are dealt with first.
We could not find that town. Try another spelling, or choose whichever provincial capital lies closest; as everything is handled remotely, you get the same service in all nine Austrian states.